QA & Software Testing
Software that's actually been tested before it reaches your users
A lot of bugs don't get caught because there was never a real process for catching them — just a developer clicking around before a release and hoping for the best. We build testing into the delivery process itself, not something squeezed in the day before launch.
Core Capabilities
What we actually do
Manual testing
Someone actually using the product the way a real customer would, not just running through a checklist.
Automated testing
Regression suites that run on every release, so the same bug doesn't slip through twice.
Performance testing
Checking how the product holds up under real traffic, not just on a quiet server with nobody on it.
API and integration testing
Making sure the different parts of your product actually talk to each other correctly, especially after adding a new integration.
Release QA
A final check before anything ships, so "it worked on my machine" isn't the bar we're working to.
Target Audience
Who this is actually for
Teams shipping regularly who don't have (or don't want to hire) a dedicated QA person in-house, or teams that got burned once by a release that broke something nobody caught in time. This also works well alongside our own development projects — QA involved from the start instead of only at the end.
No in-house dedicated QA team
Teams shipping regularly who don't have (or don't want to hire) a dedicated QA person in-house.
Teams burned by broken releases
Teams that got burned once by a release that broke something critical nobody caught in time.
End-to-end development & testing
Projects where QA is involved from day one alongside development instead of retrofitted the day before launch.
Methodology
How we work
Discover
Figure out what a broken release actually costs you, and where bugs tend to slip through right now.
Set up
Build test plans and automated suites around your actual product, not a generic template.
Test
Manual and automated testing that runs on your release schedule, not ours.
Report
Clear bug reports your team can actually act on, not just a spreadsheet full of test IDs nobody reads.
Clear Answers
Questions people usually ask
Either. Plenty of our QA clients have their own development team and just need testing handled separately.
Automated testing catches the same issues fast, every time — it's good for regression. Manual testing catches things automation misses, like something that technically works but feels wrong to use. Most products end up needing a mix of both.
Usually within a couple of weeks of an initial scoping call, depending on how complex the product is.